Kubacak v. State

McCORD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a daytime burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

Appellant made a motion for a new trial, first, on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict; second, because of the illegal admission of testimony, and, third, because the court erred in his charge to the jury. The last ground can not be considered as the motion fails to point out in what particular the charge of the court was erroneous. Simply to say in the motion that the court erred in his charge to the jury is too general, and…