Legal Opinion

Bartley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1904No. 2758PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant insists the indictment is deficient, because it alleges the property taken from the alleged burglarized house was so taken with the intent to appropriate it to the use and benefit of him, the said Will Bartlett; the contention being that his name is not Bartlett but Bartley. The indictment charges that Will Bartley committed the burglary, and that the entry into the residence was with the intent of him, the said Will Bartley, fraudulently to take, steal and carry away property out of said house; the concluding sentence of the indictment being, “with intent…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Kubacak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Vance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API