Legal Opinion
Katz v. R. Hoe & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohalan, J.
In this action, two common stockholders of the corporate defendant (hereinafter referred to as “ Hoe ”) seek to enjoin a consolidation of Hoe with a wholly owned subsidiary corporation.
*461On the day the trial in this case was concluded and when the matter was sub judice (the court awaiting the briefs of the litigants) plaintiff applied to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for substantially the same relief he asks in this litigation.
This action necessitates an examination of the question as to whether this court has jurisdiction of the issues presented here.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Beloff v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Anderson v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Turner v. American Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Williams v. BartellNew York Supreme Court · 1962