Legal Opinion

Pursley-Wilson Investment Company v. George D. Gordon, R. A. Deison and Roger Broach

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 18, 2002No. 13-01-00017-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-01-017-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI-EDINBURG

PURSLEY - WILSON INVESTMENT

COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

GEORGE D. GORDON, R. A. DEISON

AND ROGER BROACH, Appellees.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No.3

of Montgomery County, Texas.

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Wittig[1]

Opinion by Justice Wittig

Appellant, Pursley-Wilson Investment Company, complains the trial court gave improper preferences when it disbursed funds from a receivership. As we understand the brief of appellant, appellant maintains it is entitled to judgment as a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Roberson v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In the Interest of W.E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API