Wroten v. Robbins
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Mason county, Wright, J., entered January 9, 1918, in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for a receiver of a partnership, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
— The respondents and the defendant Barron were, at and before the time of the bringing of *394this action, copartners doing business as Mill'Créék' Logging Company. On October 3,1916, the copartnership as it was then-constituted, purchased from the appellant Robbins a logging outfit, camp outfit, and equipment, and entered into a written agreement of conditional sale with respect thereto, by which the appellant reserved title to the property in himself, which contract does not appear to have been filed for record. The contract provides that the partnership is to be paid for handling and booming…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gray v. HickeyWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Anderson v. TingleyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Maris v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. Ship Lumber Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
- Bank v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Ginsberg v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Fouts v. Chicago Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
- Radford v. Washington Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.