Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Katz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 4, 1980No. 4438-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, J.

The issues presented in this appeal of 18 orders entered in consolidated actions in Superior Court for King County arose in the aftermath of a real estate partnership dissolution and receivership. As to 10 of those orders, the appeal has been dismissed previously by order of this court, and a petition to review that order has been denied by the Supreme Court. The principals of the partnership, Herman Ginsberg and Archie Katz, have long since settled their dispute. The impetus for this appeal was the trial court's refusal to grant appellant Katz permission to bring suit against the partnership…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dike v. DikeWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bordeaux v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. Riverside UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Snyder v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Krist v. Aetna Casualty & SuretyWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wilson v. HenkleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Interlake Co. v. Von HakeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API