Legal Opinion

Ellen Equipment Corp. v. C v. Consultants & Associates, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2008No. 27,029PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CASTILLO, Judge.

{1} This appeal turns on the provisions of the New Mexico Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), NMSA 1978, §§ 56-10-14 to -25 (1989). In relevant part, Section 56-10-18 provides that a transfer made by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor if the debtor made the transfer (1) with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor or (2) without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer under circumstances set out in the statute. Section 56-10-18. In order for a transfer to be voidable, the creditor must prove either one…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kestenbaum v. Pennzoil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Chavarria v. Fleetwood Retail Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Chavarria v. Fleetwood Retail Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Blood v. NofzingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. FIRST NAT. BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE v. AbrahamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  2. In re: Thomas C. Wettach v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  3. Skyline Potato Co. v. Tan-O-On Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  4. In Re ChannonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  5. Beaver v. BrumlowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API