Legal Opinion

State v. Brokaw

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 27, 1981PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPakskey, J.

The defendant has appealed his conviction of attempted assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a~59 (a) (1) 1 rendered pursuant to a jury verdict of guilty. On appeal he raises two claims of error: (1) the admission into evidence of certain hearsay statements and (2) the jury instructions which improperly shifted the burden of proof on the element of intent.

The jury could have reasonably found the following facts from the evidence produced at trial: Several members of the Southington police department sought to apprehend the defendant on October 18,1976.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. VennardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. State v. MaggardArizona Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. State v. StankowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. State v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API