Legal Opinion

Pendergast v. Muns

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1931No. File No. 6961PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J-

The action above entitled was instituted in the circuit court of Minnehaha county, S. D., by Michael and Florence Pendergast, as executors of Rose Pendergast, plaintiffs, against Ed. Muns, defendant, on August 3, 1925. In that action Edwin Erickson, J. W. Mooty and Adrian State Bank, a corporation, were garnished. The garnishment process was served upon the garnishees named and upon the principal defendant Muns. On August 10, 1925, the garnishees made a joint disclosure reciting that they were indebted to the principal defendant M'uns and to one Ingram (who, as the record shows,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Langley v. . WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. McDonald v. NapierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  3. State ex rel. Sholseth v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Butcher v. HenningNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Pendergast v. MunsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pond v. McNellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Gesinger v. GesingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Jacobson v. LeisingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Peterson v. Great American InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Gluscic v. Avera St. Luke'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API