Legal Opinion

Mineika v. UNION NAT'L BANK OF CHICAGO

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 19, 1975No. 60764PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Plaintiff, Kenneth Mineika, brought this action in the circuit court of Cook County against Rosemoor Auto Exchange (hereinafter Rosemoor) and Union National Bank of Chicago (hereinafter the Bank) to recover a 1967 Cadillac or the value of said automobile, alleged to have been wrongfully detained by defendants. Plaintiff also sought the sum of $5,000 in special damages for the alleged detention.

The Bank filed a motion to dismiss the action on the ground that plaintiff was in default under the terms of a certain retail installment contract and its action in repossessing the vehicle in question…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. GersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Hogan v. AkinIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Crosby v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Behrens v. W. S. Bills & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Commerce Union Bank v. Midland National InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. In Re Application of BusseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Bull v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Hutchings v. SternbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Lazarus v. PascucciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API