Crosby v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court · GoldbergJustice Goldberg
In this action for damages for an allegedly unlawful detention of an automobile, Samuel Crosby (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the City of Chicago (defendant) after trial by the court. After the filing of plaintiff’s amended complaint, alleging wrongful detention of the car, the City filed an answer in which it admitted that plaintiff was the lawful owner of the automobile; denied that plaintiff was damaged by loss of earnings of $25 per day or by assessment of towing and storage charges as he had alleged and denied that the detention was wrongful. The answer also…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Goldberg.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stigler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. FlemingIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Cottrell v. GersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- Lorillard v. Field Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Jeffrey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Duran v. Leslie Oldsmobile, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- In Re Application of BusseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Ainsworth v. Century Supply Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Cruthis v. Firstar Bank, N.A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Hutchings v. SternbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.