Legal Opinion

People v. Stanley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 9, 1994No. 3-92-0917PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stouder

Defendant, Jerold Stanley, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. The primary issue before us is whether trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to move for a dismissal of charges on statutory speedy trial grounds. For reasons that follow, we reverse and remand this cause for a new trial.

The record on appeal establishes that defendant and his wife, Kathleen, were taken into custody on May 13, 1987, on a joint charge of aggravated criminal sexual assault (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 12 — 14(b)(1)) allegedly committed on or about May 13,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. People v. HawkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. People v. StatonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. People v. GlassAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. QuigleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. BoydAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. People v. GoodenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Gattis v. SnyderDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API