Legal Opinion

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. American Federation of Labor

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 8, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 21783PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, District Judge.

In this case the Court has before it for disposition several motions: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Drop Party Plaintiff; Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and to Quash Service; and Defendants’ Motion to Strike or Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The Court will consider the last and the first of these three motions, as this course will clear the underbrush and get us to the tree.

An amendment to a complaint which adds or drops a party requires an order of the Court (Rule 21, F.R.Civ.P.), regardless of whether it precedes or follows the first responsive pleading of any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. American Fiber & Finishing, Inc. v. Tyco Healthcare Group, LPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Kaminsky v. AbramsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. Cushing v. CohenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. Gordon v. LipoffDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API