Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 23, 1992No. 01-91-00406-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OLIVER-PARROTT, Chief Justice.

Appellant was charged by indictment with, and pled guilty to, possession of a controlled substance, namely cocaine, in an amount weighing less than 28 grams. The court assessed punishment at 20 years confinement. We affirm.

In his first two points of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred “in entering its judgment of conviction” because there was no valid written waiver of the right to trial by jury and because there was no valid stipulation of evidence. Because these points are related, we consider them together.

Article 1.13 of the Texas…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Foster v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  3. Pifer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  4. Hahn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Alcides Melendez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API