Rodriguez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant pled guilty and was convicted of possession of cocaine in an amount less than twenty-eight grams. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement for twenty years. The conviction was affirmed. Rodriguez v. State, 834 S.W.2d 592 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st], 1992). In his petition for discretionary review, Appellant raises seven grounds, including two which allege the Court of Appeals erred in refusing to consider Appellant’s motion to suppress and motion for disclosure of the informant, along with an attached affidavit, in…
3Cases cited1 opinion
4Cited by35 opinions
- Manzi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Pifer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- State v. Dixon, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.