Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1992No. 1330-92PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant pled guilty and was convicted of possession of cocaine in an amount less than twenty-eight grams. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement for twenty years. The conviction was affirmed. Rodriguez v. State, 834 S.W.2d 592 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st], 1992). In his petition for discretionary review, Appellant raises seven grounds, including two which allege the Court of Appeals erred in refusing to consider Appellant’s motion to suppress and motion for disclosure of the informant, along with an attached affidavit, in…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

4Cited by35 opinions

  1. Manzi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  4. Pifer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  5. State v. Dixon, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API