Legal Opinion

Pretl v. Ford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 17, 1998No. 1961693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Michael Pretl brought this action to enforce an attorneys’ fee-sharing agreement that he had entered into with the defendant Robert H. Ford. The case was presented to a jury, which returned a verdict for Pretl in the amount of $132,843.07. Ford moved for a judgment as a matter of law after Pretl rested his case; he renewed his motion at the close of all the evidence; and he asserted his motion once again after the jury had returned its verdict. See Rule 50, Ala. R.Civ.P. In support of his motions, Ford argued that Pretl lacked the capacity to bring this action and that the fee-sharing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Triplett v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Gaines, Gaines & Gaines, PC v. HARECourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Kohen v. BD. OF SCH. COM'RS OF MOBILE CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Gardendale Subaru Motors, Inc. v. FieldsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barber v. Barber ex rel. BarberCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  2. Ex parte Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama and Employees' Retirement System of Alabama v. Baldwin County Planning and Zoning Department; Baldwin County Board of Adjustment No. 1; and Point Clear Property Owners Association, Inc.) (Baldwin Circuit Court: CV-21-900858; Civil Appeals CL-2022-0697).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025
  3. Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. v. WigginsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API