Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Martindale v. Lauer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1888No. 13,432PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This action is prosecuted under the provisions of section 6339 of the Revised Statutes of 1881, to recover the statutory penalty for making and returning a false and fraudulent list of taxable property.

The complaint reads thus: “ The plaintiff complains of the defendant, and says that the said defendant now is, and has been for two years last passed, a resident of the city of Plymouth, in Center township, Marshall county, Indiana; that the assessor of said township, John A. Palmer, between the 1st day of April, 1886, and the 1st day of June of said year, gave to the defendant a blank schedule…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burgh v. State ex rel. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Durham v. State ex rel. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Swift v. State ex rel. DevelinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Warner v. State ex rel. HaywoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API