Legal Opinion

Swift v. State ex rel. Develin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1892No. 217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

The appellant was sued for the recovery of a penalty, under section 6339, R..S. 1881, being section 71 of the statute of 1881, concerning taxation. The question as to the sufficiency of the complaint, after verdict, is presented.

*286In the complaint,filed on the 27th of October, 1888, it was alleged that “ the defendant, Hannah H. Swift,' is now, and for three years last past has been, a resident of Whitewater township of said Franklin county, Indiana; that on the 1st day of April, 1888, said defendant, Swift, was the owner of certain promissory notes for moneys loaned by her on time,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burgh v. State ex rel. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Durham v. State ex rel. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Davis v. State ex rel. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Martindale v. LauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LaPlante v. State ex rel. GoodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API