Robinson v. State

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Maurice Lamar Robinson appeals from the judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of cocaine. He claims the trial court erred when, instead of accepting the jury’s first of three verdicts as an acquittal, the court found the verdict was unclear and instructed the jury to resume deliberations to clarify the verdict. For the following reasons, we find no error and affirm the judgment entered on the subsequent guilty verdict accepted by the trial court.

Robinson was indicted and tried before a jury on the charge of possession of…