Legal Opinion
Concern Sojuzvneshtrans v. Buyanovski
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 31, 1999No. Civ.A. 98-4490PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
Before the Court are the motions of defendants Lev Buyanovsky (“Buyanov-sky”) and Vladimir Emerel (“Emerel”) (together, “defendants”) to dismiss plaintiffs Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 The Court has decided the matters on the papers pursuant to Rule 78. For the following reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part defendants’ motions for dismissal.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Concern Sojuzvneshtrans (“SVT”) is a corporation established and existing under the laws of the Russian Federation. Buyanovsky is a Russian…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Orion Tire Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- JSC Foreign Economic Ass'n Technostroyex-Port v. International Development & Trade Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Emcore Corp. v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Orion Tire Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.