Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hoffman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1955No. 1051Published

1DissentStruckmeyer, Justice

The judgment of conviction should be set aside for the reason that an essential element of the offense is absent. The evidence affirmatively discloses that the merchandise was resold in the manner as is customary in the food brokerage business. There is no intimation whatsoever that the resales were in any way fraudulent. It is not every debtor who removes, sells, conveys, assigns or conceals with intent to defraud but it is:

“Every debtor who fraudulently removes his property or effects out of this state, or fraudulently sells, conveys, assigns or conceals his property, with intent to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API