Legal Opinion

State v. Langley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2012No. CC 88C21624; SC S053206PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

This case is before this court for the third time on automatic and direct review of a judgment that imposed a sentence of death for aggravated murder. This court has previously affirmed defendant’s aggravated murder convictions, but twice has vacated his sentence of death and remanded for further penalty-phase proceedings, as we discuss in greater detail below. On this third review, defendant raises 27 assignments of error related to the third and most recent penalty-phase proceeding. As his second assignment of error, defendant submits that the trial court erred by requiring him to proceed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. HightowerOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. ClardyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. StantonOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API