Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Swindoll
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 14, 2011No. 3D10-1609Published
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Chief Judge.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals from a final judgment in William Swindoll’s favor on his uninsured motorist (UM) benefits claim. Because Swindoll was permitted to make the payment of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits and the standard for the payment of such benefits a feature of the trial below, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
On May 14, 2006, Swindoll was involved in an automobile accident, allegedly injuring his neck. Following the accident, he sought accident-related treatment from a chiropractor and from his primary care physician,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flores v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Race v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. RudnickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. RaceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- McKenna v. CarlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.