Legal Opinion

Flores v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 23, 2002No. SC00-2281PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

819 So.2d 740 (2002)

Ruben FLORES, Petitioner,

v.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. SC00-2281.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 23, 2002.

D. Russell Stahl, Tampa, FL, for Petitioner.

Christopher J. Nicholas and Anthony J. Russo of Butler Burnette Pappas, Tampa, FL, for Respondent.

PARIENTE, J.

We have for review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Flores v. Allstate Insurance Co., 772 So.2d 4, 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), in which the Second District certified a question of great public importance:

DOES AN INSURED LOSE ALL BENEFITS UNDER A DIVISIBLE INSURANCE POLICY WHERE THE…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. State Farm Fire & Cas. v. CTC DEVELOPMENTSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. Brown v. Progressive Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Young v. Progressive Southeastern Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Custer Medical Center v. United Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  3. Geico General Insurance Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Robin CurranSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  5. Special v. BauxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API