Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Deeringer

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 2006No. AP-75,310PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · PricePrice, J.

Keller, P.J., and Meyers, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, and Cochran, JJ. joined.

We filed and set this post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus, brought pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1 in order to address the proper disposition of a writ application that presents substantive claims challenging the felony judgment of conviction, and, in a separate claim, also seeks credit against his sentence for time spent incarcerated pending trial. We have said that the latter type of claim should be dismissed, because the applicant has another remedy by…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TorresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Ex Parte YbarraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

4Cited by51 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FlorenceCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. In Re BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. In Re Gomez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  4. Ex Parte MolinaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Salvador Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API