Legal Opinion

In Re Gomez

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided September 16, 2008No. 03-08-00512-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.

Jose Urrutia Gomez petitions for writ of mandamus to compel the district court to enter a nunc pro tunc order modifying his judgment of conviction to reflect back-time credit. For the reasons explained herein, we will conditionally grant relief.

On June 5, 2001, Gomez pled guilty to sexual assault of a child. The written plea agreement was memorialized in a form titled “Plea Bargain Agreement” that contained blanks for numerous potential terms. Only some of the blanks were completed with typed or handwritten notations:

[[Image here]]

Thus, of the numerous blanks in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YbarraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Ex Parte PoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Ex Parte DoppsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Salvador Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  2. Kevin L. Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
  3. Michael Kay Pullen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  4. Michael Kay Pullen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  5. Michael Kay Pullen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API