Legal Opinion

Ruthruff v. Tower Holding Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 2004No. Docket No. 246935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FER CURIAM.

Flaintiff Jimmy D. Ruthruff appeals by leave granted a February 3, 2003, order of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC) affirming a magisrate’s decision to deny benefits on the ground that plaintiff failed to establish a compensable back injury. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

i

On February 26, 2001, while employed by defendant Tower Holding Corporation as a welder, plaintiff parked his vehicle in Tower’s parking lot. He then opened the *615vehicle’s door, put one leg out of the door, placed his foot on the ground, and turned to the right to pick up his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Whetro v. AwkermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Simkins v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Layman v. Newkirk Electric Associates Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ruthruff v. Tower Holding corporation/tower Automotive, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Christopher Kollinger v. Miller Broach IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Raymond C Atwood IV v. Con Way Freight IncorporatedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Raymond R Smith v. Chrysler Group LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Ruthruff v. TOWER HOLDING CORP./TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API