Ruthruff v. Tower Holding Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FER CURIAM.
Flaintiff Jimmy D. Ruthruff appeals by leave granted a February 3, 2003, order of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC) affirming a magisrate’s decision to deny benefits on the ground that plaintiff failed to establish a compensable back injury. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
i
On February 26, 2001, while employed by defendant Tower Holding Corporation as a welder, plaintiff parked his vehicle in Tower’s parking lot. He then opened the *615vehicle’s door, put one leg out of the door, placed his foot on the ground, and turned to the right to pick up his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Whetro v. AwkermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Simkins v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Layman v. Newkirk Electric Associates Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ruthruff v. Tower Holding corporation/tower Automotive, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Christopher Kollinger v. Miller Broach IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025
- Raymond C Atwood IV v. Con Way Freight IncorporatedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Raymond R Smith v. Chrysler Group LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Ruthruff v. TOWER HOLDING CORP./TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004