Legal Opinion

Chilcote v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1993No. Docket 128893, 129002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, P.J.

In these consolidated appeals, the parties appeal by leave granted from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board that found plaintiff entitled to continuing benefits for partial disability from autumn of 1984 onward. We reverse.

The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff worked for defendant from 1954 until September 30, 1981, when a labor dispute resulted in a union strike against defendant. On January 18, 1982, defendant refused the union’s offer to return to work. Apparently, the strike has never been resolved.

In June 1984, plaintiff sought workers’ compensation benefits, claiming…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dressler v. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pigue v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Mullins v. DURA CORPORATIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Gibbs v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Jones v. AUTO SPECIALTIES MANUFACTURING COMPANYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nederhood v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Nederhood v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API