Legal Opinion
Wyeth v. RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 14, 2006No. Civ. 05-2252(GEB)PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BROWN, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Ranbaxy, Inc. and Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s (collectively referred to as “Ranbaxy”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings with Respect to Plaintiffs Allegation of Willful Infringement. The Court decided the motion based on the parties’ written submissions and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court grants-in-part and denies-in-part Ranbaxy’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
This is a patent infringement action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Roger Turbe v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Virgin Islands Water and Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Rivera v. City of Camden Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Caissie v. City of Cape MayDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- GJJM Enters., LLC v. City of Atl. CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Deal v. VelezDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Ingerman v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.