Barclay v. Tussey
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Appellants seek reversal of a judgment in an ejectment suit brought by appellees. Appellants assert two points for reversal, the first of which we find to be without merit. On the second, we find merit and reverse.
The first point is based upon appellees’ failure to comply with the requirement that a plaintiff in ejectment must rely upon the strength of his own title and not the weakness of that of his adversary. In their complaint, appellees merely alleged that they had title by virtue of a deed which they exhibited. Appellants raised no objection to this pleading…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Landers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Morgan v. DownsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Stricker v. BrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Koonce v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Gingles v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lewis v. MoorheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Hicks v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- White River Levee District v. ReidharCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Walker v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- Fulkerson v. Van BurenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.