Legal Opinion

McDuffee v. Hestonville, M. & F. Pass. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1910No. 45PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by John I. McDuffee, trustee, and the Allis-Chalrners Company, ágainst the Hestonville, Mantua & Eairmount Passenger Railway Company and the General Electric Company. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

The patent in suit, No. 546,059, dated September 10, 1895, issued from the United States Patent Office to William M. Schlesinger, assignor to John I. McDuffee, Trustee, *504for alleged improvements in electric railways. The suit is prosecuted by John I. McDuffee, Trustee, and the Allis-Chalmers Company, the present owners of the patent, against the Hestonville, Mantua & Fairmount Passenger Railway Company, the user, and the General Electric Company, the manufacturer and seller, of the alleged infringing railway apparatus or equipment. No question is raised as to title or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hestonville, M. & F. Pass. Ry. Co. v. McDuffeeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  2. Orange-Crush Grapico Bottling Co. v. Seven-Up CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1955
  3. Field v. ColmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API