Legal Opinion
Orange-Crush Grapico Bottling Co. v. Seven-Up Company
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided February 10, 1955No. Civ. A. 7051PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNNE, Chief Judge.
Moving to quash service of the summons and complaint herein, defendant, a foreign corporation not qualified to do business in Alabama, contends that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action and of the defendant, that the service of process on defendant was insufficient, and that the statute under which service was had is unconstitutional.
Service of process in this case was had on defendant by serving the Secretary of State who, in turn, forwarded the summons and complaint to the defendant. The procedure followed was in conformity with the provisions…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Smyth v. Twin State Improvement Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
- Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chas. D. Long and Samuel H. Liberman, Trustees, and Paul E. Hord and Jane S. Hord v. Victor Products Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Gayle v. Magazine Management Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1957
- Ar-Con Building Specialties, Inc. v. Famco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973