Legal Opinion

Strahan v. Frazier

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 1, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-12355-WGYPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

YOUNG, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

Richard Max Strahan 1 (“Strahan”) may be a latter day William Lloyd Garrison. Loud, obnoxious, irascible, contentious, obstreperous, and utterly contemptuous of court processes, when watching and listening to him, see generally Prelim. Inj. Hr’g Tr.; Mot. Hr’g Tr., one can hear Garrison say, “I am in earnest — I will not equivocate — I will not excuse — I will not retreat a single inch — AND I WILL BE HEARD.” William Lloyd Garrison, To the Public, The Liberator, Jan. 1, 1831. Stra-han is, of course, the paradigmatic measure of this Court’s ability…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. SweeneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  2. Barr v. GalvinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  3. Aaron v. City of LowellDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
  4. Doe v. City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
  5. Spanish Church of God of Holyoke, Mass., Inc. v. ScottDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API