Legal Opinion

McQuade v. Jaffray

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1891PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Ejectment for lands in St. Louis county, brought in the district court for that county and tried before Stearns, J., who ordered judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.1

The plaintiff claims the premises in controversy under two tax titles, — one under a sale in 1881 for the taxes of 1879 and prior years, and the other under the regular sale in 1882 for the taxes of 1881. Both tax titles were held good by the court below; but of course, if either is good, the order appealed from must be affirmed.

1. In the proceedings before judgment, in both the original and published lists, the name of the owner was given as E. S. Jeffrey, instead of E. S. Jaffray, which was his correct name, and the one in which the title stood of record. It does not appear in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kipp v. DawsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Western Land Ass'n v. McComberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Gilfillan v. HobartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Sperry v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Chouteau v. HuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Williams v. PittockWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Marble v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Washburn v. Gregory Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Woodrough v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. White Pine Manufacturing Co. v. MoreyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API