Christopher Busbee v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
' Christopher Busbee files a petition alleging that his appellate counsel was ineffective in his direct criminal appeal, We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App, P. 9.141(d). For the reasons explained below, we find merit in Busbee’s claims and grant the petition.
Busbee received 17 overall-sentences, all concurrent. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court announced its intent to sen tence Busbee as a habitual felony offender (“HFO”) on all counts.
Case No. ll-CF-1166
The first three sentences were imposed in a violation of probation case, lower tribunal case number ll-CF-1166. We first note…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Champagne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Leroy Spatcher v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Champagne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Edward Abruscato v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Watts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017