Champagne v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Judge.
Renaldo Champagne challenges the denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Champagne does not challenge the life sentence imposed on his conviction for robbery with a firearm; he contends only that the twenty-year sentence imposed on his conviction for false imprisonment, a third-degree felony, is illegal. We conclude that Champagne's twenty-year sentence is legal, and we certify a question of great public importance.
Champagne was sentenced under the Criminal Punishment Code, chapter 921, Florida Statutes (2005) (CPC).…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Tripp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- AARON MOHANLAL v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- DAVID PARSONS AND MARLA PARSONS v. PATRICIA CULPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- FRANKLIN E. TREADWAY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- SEAN PATRICK EMKE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- State of Florida v. Ridge GabrielSupreme Court of Florida · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.