Legal Opinion

Gillham v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1922No. 2579PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). It appeared from testimony that appellee did not keep a watchman at the Stonewall street crossing, and did not maintain there a signal bell, gates, or any other means of warning people approaching the crossing of the approach of a train. The trial court instructed the jury to find for appellants if they believed that appellee was therefore guilty of negligence which was a proximate cause of Gillham’s death. Appellants insist that a finding in their favor on that issue was demanded by the testimony, and that the trial court therefore erred when he refused to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MageeTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. MeaslesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Texas Power & Light Co. v. BristowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Tiffin v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. DonaldsonTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Texas & N. O. R. v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LongTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Texas Mexican R. Co. v. BunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Thompson v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API