Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Donaldson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1889No. 2686PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before Hon. Wm. H. Stewart.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Chief Justice.—

Donaldson sued the railroad company to recover damages for injury to his grass, fencing, trees, etc., alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the company in allowing sparks to escape from one of its engines whilst passing near the property, whereby fire was communicated to combustible matter left on and near its track, from which it was communicated to the plaintiff’s property, and in failing to extinguish the fire after it was thus communicated.

On cross-examination of O’Connor, a witness for defendant, the plaintiff asked the following question: “Was there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. NoelIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Memphis Cotton Oil Co. v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Whitaker v. ThayerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Gillham v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Challenge Co. v. SartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API