Sherrell v. Bugaski
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The trial court found that as a matter of law plaintiff did not suffer from serious impairment of body function and, thus, did not meet the threshold requirement mandated by MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135 to allow recovery for noneconomic damages sustained after suffering injuries in an automobile accident. We agree and affirm.
In Cassidy v McGovern, 415 Mich 483, 502; 330 NW2d 22 (1982), the Court held that when there is no factual dispute regarding the nature and extent of a plaintiff’s injuries, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Braden v. LeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by16 opinions
- DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Sherrell v. BugaskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Franz v. WoodsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Shaw v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kreiner v FischerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.