Legal Opinion

Canepa v. Durham

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1948No. 3517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J. :

Appellants have filed a petition for rehearing- in which they emphasize the fact that in our former opinion we expressed the view that the testimony, both of Belz and the Durhams, was much weakened by the cross examination and by the very leading and suggestive form of the questions by which the testimony was elicited. Appellants’ petition for rehearing urges that the testimony of these witnesses is not entitled to credence and supplies no substantial evidence in support of the trial court’s findings. Numerous opinions of this court have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canepa v. DurhamNevada Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Torp v. ClemonsNevada Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Canepa v. DurhamNevada Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API