Legal Opinion
Cassidy v. Holliman & Spiers
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 1930No. 591PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
John H. Cassidy and Daniel E. Sheridan, owners of the E% of the WVz of section 20, headright 41, township 1 S, range 13 E, except 50 acres reserved by John Green on the north end, sold and delivered the pine timber on said land to C. H. Holliman and R. S. Spiers by written contract dated January 2, 1928. The ¡price of the sale was $7 per M, to be paid as the timber was cut and removed. The contract provided that Holliman & Spiers were to deliver all the lumber manufactured from the timber on said land to pie Colonial Creosoting Company, Inc., in Bogalusa, and the creosoting company was to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. Pullman Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
- Bluefields S. S. Co. v. Lala Ferreras Cangelosi S. S. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Kernan v. HumbleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- J. Grossman's Sons v. ChachereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Rabassa v. Orleans Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1833
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tabb v. NorredLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Strahan v. STATE, THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRYLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Cheramie Services v. Shell Deepwater Prod.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Murray v. ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATESDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2007
- Cheramie Services, Inc. v. Shell Deepwater Production, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009