Legal Opinion
Hoyl v. Babbitt
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 25, 1997No. 96-1388PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Alfred G. Hoyl appeals the district court’s order affirming the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) denial of his request for a coal lease suspension pursuant to § 39 of the Mineral Leasing Act. 30 U.S.C. § 209. As grounds for reversal, Plaintiff asserts that: 1) the district court’s-findings of fact are not supported by substantial evidence; 2) the district court erred by affirming the BLM’s denial of his request for a coal lease suspension because “the denial differed significantly from past agency precedent;” 3) the district court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Benedictor Diaz-Resendez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Johnnie Louis McAlpine v. United States of America and Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- City of Albuquerque v. BrownerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Clouser v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Federal Lands Legal Consortium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Pennaco Energy, Inc. v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Colorado Wild v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation & EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Ross v. Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.