Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1989No. CV-88-0298-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Claimant, Frank Roberts, injured his back in an industrial accident. An administrative law judge found claimant’s loss of earning capacity to be 75.89 percent. Claimant appealed and the court of appeals affirmed. Claimant petitioned this court for review challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the award. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Ariz. R.Civ.App.P. 23, 17B A.R.S.

II. ISSUE

Does the evidence reasonably support the administrative law judge’s finding that work as a cashier or sales clerk was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Davis v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Zimmerman v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Germany v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Franco v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Polanco v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Meiners v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. Baca v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Calder v. interstate/zurichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Ellisor v. Az Ice peoria/cincinnatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API