Legal Opinion

Liphart v. Myers

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1916No. 20,056PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Jewell district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover on two promissory notes. The petition was amended and a demurrer to the amended petition was sustained on the ground that the, action was barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiff appeals.

The petition contained two causes of action, one on each *687note. The circumstances are such that if one be barred the other is barred, and consequently but one need be considered. One of the notes, with the indorsements upon it, reads as follows:

“$22§.00 Lena, III., Mar. 26, 1892.
“Thirty months after date I promise to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Pears v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Easter v. EasterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  4. Hamilton v. CoffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. James v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Fisher v. PendletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Becker v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Hayes v. ReidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Clark v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API