Legal Opinion

Kincey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1989No. A89A0082PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Defendant Joseph Kincey appeals from his conviction and sentence for the offense of burglary. Held:

1. Defendant first contends that the State used its peremptory strikes in a racially discriminatory manner in violation of the mandate of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79 (106 SC 1712, 90 LE2d 69) (1986). Defendant, who is black, was tried by an all-white jury after the State used three of its peremptory challenges to strike three blacks from the venire, which was composed of thirty-nine whites and three blacks. The record shows that two of the jurors were struck because they had…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. Mincey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Metheny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Connerly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API