Legal Opinion
Metheny v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 4, 1990No. A90A2293PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
After a jury trial, Robert Lee Metheny was convicted of the offense of habitual violator for operating a motor vehicle after having received notice that his driver’s license had been revoked pursuant to OCGA § 40-5-58. He appeals from the judgment entered on the conviction. Held:
1. Metheny contends that after a hearing pursuant to Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368 (84 SC 1774, 12 LE2d 908) (1964), the trial court erred by failing to exclude statements, admitted in the prosecution’s case-in-chief, that he made to police officers before he was given warnings pursuant to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Gober v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- State v. TroutmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.