Legal Opinion · Dissent

DeRolph v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2001No. 99-570Published

1DissentAlice Robie Resnick, J.

I am compelled to take a position adverse to that of today’s majority. This is not because I oppose mediation of this dispute, but because I believe that the timing of the majority’s order is incongruous. To be mediating this matter at this time signifies only that the schoolchildren of Ohio have suffered yet another loss. Once again, the state’s educational system is faced with the prospect of further tweaking, while the fundamental changes to the overall system will be lacking.

As this court has emphatically pointed out several times, our state’s school-funding system has been plagued by an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Claremont School District v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API