Legal Opinion

DeRolph v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2000No. 99-570PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

I

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION

In DeRolph I, after an exhaustive review of the evidence, a majority of this court concluded that Ohio’s system of primary and secondary public schools in place at that time fell well short of the mandate of Section 2, Article VI. DeRolph I recognized that, despite the earnest efforts of the General Assembly, it was simply impossible to characterize the existing system as “thorough and efficient.” Accordingly, this court declared the-system unconstitutional and stated that the General Assembly must devise and implement a new “thorough and efficient” system.

Now,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edgewood Independent School District v. KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Board of Education v. WalterOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding, Inc. v. RellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Montoy v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. Montoy v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API