Patrick v. Tetzlaff
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered in defendant’s favor.
This action, as formulated by the complaint, was one of claim and delivery, wherein it was alleged that the defendant “wrongfully” took from the possession of the plaintiff a certain automobile and continued to retain possession of the same after demand made. The usual judgment in the alternative was asked for. The defendant filed what he designated as a cross-complaint, wherein it was set up that the automobile in question was delivered to him for the purpose of having many repairs made, and that he was entitled to payment of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- White v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Carroll v. StorckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Exclusive Florists, Inc. v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Storm & Butts v. LipscombCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- People v. KuderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944