Legal Opinion

Euclid Candy Co. v. Whitney-Central Trust & Savings Bank

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1931No. 5360PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

This case grows out of a supposed contract for the sale of sugar during the runaway market of 1920, in which" contract the Euclid Candy Company (defendant below and appellant here) was the vendee, and Sea-go (assignor to the Whitney Bank, plaintiff below) was vendor. During this market, the high prices brought into this country foreign sugars not very well known here. Among these was what was called “brown Panela lump,” a relatively rough and unrefined product of some of the Central American countries. The lumps were in the form of cones, four or five inches high and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. . TracyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Politziner v. VanechSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Darling Shops, Inc. v. BrackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API